Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: When the Data Hits the Fan!: A New Approach to Measuring Impact for Digitised Resources: do they change people’s lives?

This is a work in progress – more my notes and queries than a proper paper, stuff will change, references will be added. I wanted most to get this out there and to get your views, your inputs and your insights. Please comment, your thoughts are valued! My recent research with Marilyn Deegan into the […]

Editors' Choice

March 27 is the Day of Digital Humanities 2012

The 27th March is the Day of Digital Humanities. The Day of DH project is a collaborative publishing project for digital humanists around the world to document what they do. CAA2012 and sotonDH are asking delegates to blog from the conference as part of the day. You can register for the blog here: Create an […]

Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: Humanizing Code

I am a Computer Scientist by trade but have a strong interest in connections of my trade to other parts of the academy, such as the Arts, Humanities, Science and Engineering. So, when I saw that there was an online workshop called Critical Code Studies, I decided to go in head first by requesting participation in […]

Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: Data and Digital Humanities

“What is/are (the) Digital Humanities?” by Elijah Meeks This morning I gave a presentation on the role of data visualization in DH work. The annotated slides can be found on Google Docs here.             “How and why study big cultural data” by Lev Manovich Presentation at Data Mining and Visualization for the Humanities symposium, NYU, March […]

Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: Thinking About Infrastructure

A colleague drew my attention to Nicola Osborne’s liveblog of the very interesting event at the University of Edinburgh on 24 February 2012, Digital Scholarship: A Day of Ideas. It is wonderful to see that Edinburgh University, which, through EDINA and other activities, has made such important contributions to the growth of digital scholarship over […]

Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: The Middle Distance

Ted Underwood’s recent posts about literary and non-literary diction between 1700-1900, and the various discussions they sparked, including Katherine Harris’s post on gender and DH archives, have had me thinking a lot about cultural poetics and the middle distance. In 19th-century studies, most DH projects have tended to operate at two different scales: large-scale text analysis projects (associated with so-called […]

Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: Fast Thinking and Slow Thinking Visualisation

Last week I attended the Association of American Geographers Annual Conference and heard a talk by Robert Groves, Director of the US Census Bureau. Aside the impressiveness of the bureau’s work I was struck by how Groves conceived of visualisations as requiring either fast thinking or slow thinking. Fast thinking data visualisations offer a clear message without the need for the viewer to spend […]