Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: The Amateur in the Archive: Toward a Wider Audience for Your DH Project

Changing my form of communication reminds me of my audience. The challenges of communicating through the digital highlight the corresponding issues faced by readers of this non-traditionally presented content. My master’s thesis involved a user study evaluating the use of well-established digital humanities archives by a wider audience, a group I still refer to as […]

Editors' Choice

Soliciting Writing on Assessment and Evaluation of Digital Humanities Work

There has been increasing discussion about the evaluation of digital humanities work. Digital Humanities Now and the Journal of Digital Humanities are developing resources to help the producers and evaluators of digital humanities scholarship. We are doing this in two ways: 1) We will build a bibliography of existing statements and institutional policies in the […]

Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: Digital Humanities at MLA 2013

What follows is a comprehensive list of digital humanities sessions at the 2013 Modern Language Association Conference in Boston. These are sessions that in some way address the influence and impact of digital materials and tools upon language, literary, textual, and media studies, as well as upon online pedagogy and scholarly communication. The 2013 list […]

Editors' Choice

Announcing Open Access Now

Contact: Micah Vandegrift and the Open Access Now Editorial Board Editors [at] oanow.org Open Access Now launched today, a resource for news and information about open access and scholarly publishing. The goal of OANow is to provide a centralized, regularly updated, curated news feed, accomplished through active monitoring of scholarly, popular and niche sources. Built on the PressForward platform, which aims to […]

Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: How do you read? An analysis of survey responses

A big question for me, as a designer of text analysis tools for the humanities is: how do the tools I’m building fit in? Sure, you can have fancy word trees and grammatical search histograms. Sure, they’re chock-full of interesting information that you can make an argument about. But where exactly in the humanistic analysis […]

Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: Coded Curriculum: The New Architectures of Learning

How should we understand the part played by code in digital media and learning? We are accustomed to arguments that digital media are affecting our existing practices of reading, looking, seeing and hearing, yet relatively little is said of how the underlying code and algorithmic architectures of software actually exert those effects. The work done […]

Editors' Choice

Announcing American History Now, a US History Research Community

*Editors’ Note: American History Now is the newest journal to be launched as part of the Pressforward Project. Have you got some research, a small con­clu­sion, an idea or pos­si­bil­ity; some piece of work which isn’t really suit­able for the stan­dard jour­nal for­mat? Maybe a piece which doesn’t fit eas­ily in any sin­gle dis­ci­pline? Would you […]

Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: Recovering the Recovered Text: Diversity, Canon Building, and Digital Studies

This paper examines the state of the current digital humanities canon, provides a historical overview of the decline of early digitally recovered texts, literature designed to expand the literary canon, and offers suggestions for ways that the field might work toward expansion of the digital canon. My research shows that a subfield of early literary […]

Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: What They Preach

A few weeks ago, I posed the idea of global prayer metrics. I compared the function of prayer notices to journalism and reflected on the theology of quantifying prayer. Today’s post is a thought experiment and dataviz on measuring global religious activity across cultures. During a brainstorm with Andy Moore and James Doc at the International Fellowship of Evangelical Students a few […]