Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: No More Tools

Editors’ Summary: In this post, the author shows how the rise of AI has made the critical thinking component of using code in DH even more essential. He details his initial explorations using Claude Code to build DH web apps for use in the classroom. This post argues that the old tools of Digital Humanities […]

Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: Do all politicians sound the same? Comparing model explanations to human responses

Editor’s Summary: This article considers the bold claim that politicians from different parties really “all sound the same”. It trains an AI model on 20+ years of Finnish parliamentary speeches and compares its guesses about affiliation with that of 438 human readers. It turns out that the system is ‘better’ at telling parties apart. Humans […]

Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: More Strategies for Avoiding AI

Editors’ Summary: This post shares some practical ways college instructors can design courses so students are not completely dependent on AI. It highlights grading systems that reward process over product, moving from writing to problem solving to finally reaching a solution. It empowers the students into realising the value of thinking for themselves instead of […]

Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: Stories from Black Physicists in Our Collections

Editor’s Summary: Modern sciences in the United States has been a predominately white-dominated workplace. This project at the American Institute of Physics collects oral history interviews from Black and African American physicists. This project addresses the lack of narratives in the history of science, especially physics, from minority communities. The need to record the perspectives […]

Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: AI Inverts the Disciplinary Hierarchy

Editors’ Summary: This post questions the perceived hierarchy of disciplines in the university, and argues that the rise of generative AI challenges this hierarchy. He points to how computer science was considered the most lucrative major in the twenty-first century until the automation of coding made possible by AI. He uses the case study of […]

Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: The Price of Scale: AI, Ethics, and the Limits of the Humanities

Editor’s Summary: The question of scale is something that has been troubling many humanities disciplines even before the popularization of computational technologies. In the field of DH, we often perceive that there is an additional layer of abstraction between the researcher and subject because of the digital “screen” and scale of analysis that our technological […]

Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: Three Months of DuckDuckGo: Reflections after Partially “De-Googling”

Editors’ Summary: This series of articles comparing the user experience in DuckDuckGo and Google goes beyond a purely UX analysis. Seeing how these two search engines play in an academic or teacher’s work, we get to see how certain search engines, like Google, are more than just “search engines.” As mentioned, Google also controls our […]

Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: The Repository of Last Resort? Exploring the Role of Institutional Repositories in the Data Repository Ecosystem through Researcher Perspectives

Editors’ Summary: This paper studies a common tool for researchers to share their quantitative or data sources: the data repository run usually by university libraries. These repositories allow users to download datasets that researchers have curated. This paper provides a helpful glimpse into the user identity and persona of researchers working with data repositories. They […]

Editors' Choice

Editors’ Choice: User Experience (UX) Heuristics for the Digital Humanities

Editor’s Summary: This article argues that user experience (UX) practices are crucial yet often under-utilized and overlooked in digital humanities (DH) projects because conventional UX methods don’t align well with the complexity of humanities content. To address this challenge, the authors introduce a set of ten UX heuristics aimed at improving accessibility and audience engagement. […]